All posts

Google Ads or SEO, and why the answer is usually both for a while

Owners ask which of the two to pick. The more useful question is which one you need first, because they solve opposite halves of the same problem.

The question comes up on almost every first call. Should we do ads, or should we do SEO. It gets asked as though the two are competing for the same job, and as though picking one means the other was money wasted.

They are not the same job. One of them rents you a position today. The other earns you one that keeps paying out later. Most businesses that end up doing well online run both, in a particular order, for a reason worth understanding before you spend anything.

What you are actually choosing between

Ads put you above the results within about a day of the account being ready. You are renting that position, the price is set by an auction against everyone else who wants it, and the rent falls due every single time somebody taps your ad.

SEO is the work that earns you a place further down the same page, in the results nobody is charging you for. It is slower, it is not guaranteed, and there is no switch. It accumulates or it does not.

So the real choice is not which one works. It is whether you need something that starts today and ends when the money does, or something that starts in six months and keeps going after.

What ads are genuinely good at

Speed is the obvious one, and it matters more than people give it credit for. If your schedule has a hole in it next month, SEO cannot do anything about that. Ads can be live this week.

The less obvious one is precision. You can point ads at the exact searches you want, in the exact towns you cover, during the hours somebody actually answers the phone. Nothing in the organic results gives you that kind of control.

An orange parking meter on the edge of an empty lot, its dial reading TIME EXPIRED.
The position is rented, never owned. When the money stops, it goes back to whoever is still paying for it.

What ads cannot do

They do not leave anything behind. Pause the account and the leads stop within a day or two. Two years of steady spending buys you exactly the traffic you paid for while you were paying, and nothing that outlives it.

There is also a ceiling on how good the numbers get. A well run account gets cheaper per booked job for a while, as the wasted searches get cut out of it, and then it flattens. Past that point, more work mostly means more spend, because you and your competitors are bidding into the same auction and none of you can make it cheaper by trying harder.

What SEO is good at, and what it costs you

Organic results do not switch off. A page that has earned its place keeps bringing people in next month and the month after with no charge per click. The work you did in spring is still working in the autumn, and it is still working on the months when you decide to spend nothing at all.

What it costs is time and nerve. Months, not weeks, before any of it is worth anything, and no invoice you can pay to make it arrive faster. You are not promised the position either. You are competing for it with everybody else who wants it, on rules that change without anybody telling you.

Ads stop working the day you stop paying. SEO does not start working for months after you begin.

Why the answer is usually both for a while

Put those two sentences next to each other and the plan writes itself. SEO takes months to produce anything, and almost nobody can afford months of nothing. So you run the fast one to cover the gap the slow one leaves.

Ads carry the near term and keep the phone ringing while nothing else is producing. The slower work gets built underneath, aimed at the same searches, so that somewhere between six and twelve months out, some of what you are currently renting starts arriving on its own.

A worker on metal scaffolding against the brick gable end of an old building.
Scaffolding holds the job up while the permanent thing gets built. It is supposed to come down eventually, or at least get smaller.

What both looks like when the budget is small

Both does not mean half each. Split a small budget down the middle and you generally end up with two things doing nothing very well.

The split that tends to work is narrow and deep on the paid side, wide and slow on the free side. Ads run on the handful of searches closest to somebody with their wallet out, where the intent is unmistakable. Everything broader than that gets covered by your own pages over time, because breadth is exactly what you cannot afford to pay per click for.

For a local business there is a third thing sitting between them that often beats both on value, and it is the cheapest of the three to sort out. If your Google Business Profile is half filled in, fix that before you put money into either.

The ads pay for the SEO homework

This is the part that makes running both genuinely better than running either, and it is the part that gets skipped.

An ad account tells you, with your own money as the evidence, which searches turn into booked work. Not which ones get clicks. Which ones get jobs. After a few months you are holding a list of the exact phrases that are worth having, sorted by what they actually produced.

That list is the brief for everything you write afterwards. Without it you are guessing, which is how businesses end up with a dozen pages ranking for things nobody ever buys. Running ads first turns that guess into something you have already proven.

When it is genuinely one and not both

Two situations where the answer is simpler than all of the above.

If you already come up first for the searches that matter in your area and the phone rings enough, ads may only be buying you clicks you were getting for nothing. Check that before you spend, and be willing to find out that the answer is no ads at all.

And if clicks in your market are expensive enough that the arithmetic never closes, no budget fixes it, so everything goes into the slow half instead. That is a perfectly legitimate plan. It is just a slower one, and it is much better to know which plan you are on before the first invoice than after the third.

The reason both is usually the answer is not that both sounds more thorough. It is that the two fail in opposite directions, and running one on its own for long enough means meeting whichever failure you left uncovered.

Keep reading